Connect with us

Farming

More Pre-movement Tests Will Not Solve TB Problem

Published

on

IFA Animal Health Chairman Pat Farrell said IFA has consistently opposed the inclusion of additional pre-movement testing in the TB programme, and will continue to do so in the upcoming discussions with the Department next week.

 

This DRAFT strategy document which appeared in the media today is based on the interim report of the TB Forum, which was rejected by the IFA.

In particular, he said the proposal by the Minister to introduce a 30-day pre-movement test would severely distort the marketing of animals and place an extra cost burden on the programme, while doing little or nothing to reduce TB.

“We need to address the real causes of TB, not put another wheel under the TB testing gravy train,” he said.

“Following the debacle over the TB testing letters, IFA insisted on a new approach involving bi-laterals between the Department and farmers. The first of these meetings will take place on Tuesday and IFA will be setting out the changes we want to see in the TB programme which has developed into an industry at the expense of farmers,” he said.

Pat Farrell said the key areas identified by IFA that must be addressed to reduce the levels of TB and lower the cost burden on farms include:

  1. The withdrawal of the TB Herd Risk letters
  2. The discontinuation of the new herd categorisation approach that was included in the herd risk letters
  3. The implementation of an effective wildlife control programme
  4. Detailed and thorough on-farm investigations where TB breakdowns occur to identify the source of the disease and remove it
  5. The provision of fair financial supports to farmers whose farms are under TB controls.

Pat Farrell acknowledged the document includes some of the issues identified by IFA, including the implementation of a more effective wildlife control programme.

However, there are no details provided on how improved financial supports will be made available to farmers undergoing TB restrictions. This is a key area that must be addressed.

In the context of any controls that will form part of the TB programme going forward Pat Farrell said these must have a robust scientific basis for inclusion; make a meaningful contribution to eradicating TB; and be practical to implement at farm level.

With only 7.5% of TB breakdowns attributable to animal movements based on Department of Agriculture published statistics, this is a disproportionate and unnecessary proposal for inclusion in the programme.

Continue Reading

Farming

IFA Raises Payment Concerns with Dept at Charter of Rights Meeting

Published

on

Speaking at a Charter of Rights meeting with the Department of Agriculture this week, the IFA Deputy President Brian Rushe said it’s absolutely essential that the maximum number of applicants in tranche 19 of TAMS are approved as soon as possible to provide certainty to farmers who are planning to carry out work.

IFA Rural Development Chairman Michael Biggins welcomed confirmation that payment of the ANC balancing payment will commence next week.

He stressed the importance of paying the remaining farmers as soon as they meet their stocking density requirements, which the Dept confirmed happens on a weekly basis.  Farmers will be paid as soon as they meet the required stocking density, which in some cases will run to the end of the year.

Michael Biggins also called on the Dept to pay the ANC to farmers who omitted in error to tick the ANC box on their BPS application this year.  “A system where a farmer has to ‘opt out’ rather the ‘opt in’ would ensure there are fewer errors when submitting applications,” he said.

IFA Deputy President Brian Rushe welcomed the payment of the BPS balancing payment which commenced this week.  “The Dept also confirmed the issue around transfer of entitlement, which held up payments of around 1,000 farmers, has been resolved for most at this stage and the remaining ones will be resolved in the next week,” he said.

IFA National Livestock Chairman Brendan Golden has welcomed DAFM facilitation of farmers who made ‘Draft applications’ to BEEP-S scheme and who had operated under the impression they were participating in the scheme by carrying out measures on their farms. IFA had raised this issue directly with the Department of Agriculture and the acceptance of these farmers into the scheme is the right decision.

Regarding the Beef Finishers Payment, Brendan Golden again called for cattle exported for slaughter in the reference period to be paid on from the surplus in the Beef Finishers Payment fund.

Continue Reading

Farming

IFA Launches Guide to Personal Insolvency Arrangements

Published

on

IFA National Farm Business Chair Rose Mary McDonagh and Martin Stapleton, Chairman of the IFA Debt Support Service, have launched a Guide to Personal Insolvency Arrangements (PIA).

IFA Debt Support Service was established following the last recession to provide specific support to farmers in arrears.

The confidential service is comprised of an experienced team of IFA volunteers working with professional support to provide assistance to IFA members in financial difficulty.

Martin Stapleton said IFA has worked with over 500 farmers over the last few years. While the numbers in difficulty are reducing, recent weeks have seen an increase in activity from vulture funds since the COVID-19 Payment Breaks came to an end.

“This guide is available on IFA’s website and will serve as a useful resource for farmers in arrears seeking to protect their family home and farm land,” he said.

A Personal Insolvency Arrangement (PIA) is a debt resolution mechanism outlined in the Personal Insolvency Act, which acts as an insolvency solution for people with unsecured and secured debt.

Rose Mary McDonagh added that a PIA can provide a debtor with protection from their creditors and on completion, a debtor will return to solvency.

At present, the Oireachtas is considering one of two Bills which will reform the area of personal insolvency and amend the current eligibility requirements for a PIA. Rose Mary McDonagh said the definition of relevant debt should be expanded to include debt prior to 2015, and debt secured in or over a debtor’s income reliant/core asset.

The IFA Debt Support Service can be contacted, in confidence, at 1890 924 853.

Continue Reading

Farming

EU Must Complete an Impact Assessment of Green Strategies

Published

on

Speaking after a meeting of European Farm Leaders (COPA) with EU Executive Vice President Frans Timmermans yesterday, IFA President Tim Cullinan said that the EU must complete a full impact assessment of the EU Farm to Fork and Biodiversity strategies.

“I told the Commissioner a full impact assessment is needed to determine how much implementing these strategies will cost,” he said.

“Frans Timmermans has threatened to withdraw the Commission’s own CAP proposal if it doesn’t take more account of the Farm to Fork and Biodiversity strategies. Yet he has no idea how much these strategies will cost or who will pay for them,” he said.

“People are quoting all these targets without any consideration for their impact on output or on production costs of farmers. Farmers cannot be left to carry the can on this,” he said.

“We also need Teagasc to do an assessment of the impact in Ireland. We are currently deep in discussions on the Agrifood 2030 strategy, but again we have a data vacuum,” he said.

“It’s incredible that the Economic Research Service of the US Department of Agriculture has examined the impact of ‘Farm to Fork’ Strategy on farm incomes, output and trade and neither the EU nor Ireland has,” he said.

“The US report predicts that as a result of the strategy, farm incomes would be reduced by 16%. This is as a consequence of the expected loss of production by 12% across the EU which would not be offset by the 17% increase in market prices.”

“If these measures were implemented, the report predicts a loss in output at an EU level which would cause exports to fall by 20% and imports would increase by 2%. The knock-on effect of these changes in trade is predicted to increase the cost of food by €132 per person in the EU.”

“If these figures are correct, they would be devastating for European farmers. Yet the EU Commission doesn’t know, or won’t tell us, what their assessment of the impact will be,” he said.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2020. A Unit Ops Media Publication. Website Developed by Trigger Media